But there were also winners too. Apple has done ok, and Netflix crashed and burned in spectacular fashion. While the NFLX short idea looked like a terrible prediction shortly after recommending it, my thesis eventually worked out. Content costs rose dramatically, they had to raise prices, and subscribers bailed along with investors in the past couple of months. Doing the research does pay off.
Over the past year, as I have recommended buys (or sells) I have kept track. It wasn't hard, all of them I traded shortly before or after blogging about it. Subjecting myself to this scrutiny can only make me a better investor I think. Not doing the work, trading on emotions are enemies of long term returns. So, if you had traded every idea that I pitched either here or on seeking alpha, then this is about what your portfolio would look like. Rec Date is the date I recommended the trade. The dollar values are theoretical only.
Pr Today
|
Purchase Pr
|
Gain (Loss)
|
% Change
|
|||||
9.91
|
Long
|
933
|
$10.14
|
9,249
|
(218)
|
-2.3%
|
||
08/09/11
|
EFT
|
13.98
|
Long
|
700
|
$13.68
|
9,786
|
212
|
2.2%
|
12/13/10
|
PUBDX
|
10.98
|
Long
|
933
|
$10.81
|
10,248
|
161
|
1.6%
|
01/25/11
|
FXA
|
97.27
|
Long
|
100
|
$96.07
|
9,727
|
120
|
1.2%
|
11/10/10
|
Short Treasury TBF
|
31.61
|
Short
|
250
|
$42.22
|
7,903
|
(2,653)
|
-25.1%
|
12/27/10
|
CSJ
|
104.39
|
Long
|
100
|
$102.47
|
10,439
|
192
|
1.9%
|
57,352
|
(2,186)
|
|||||||
Equity Book
|
||||||||
13.45
|
Long
|
733
|
$13.80
|
9,863
|
(257)
|
-2.5%
|
||
12/08/10
|
UTF
|
15.32
|
Long
|
600
|
$15.13
|
9,192
|
114
|
1.3%
|
01/10/11
|
NFLX
|
63.86
|
Short Sell
|
(60)
|
$178.50
|
(3,832)
|
6,878
|
64.2%
|
09/01/11
|
YPF
|
32.58
|
Long
|
250
|
$33.83
|
8,145
|
(313)
|
-3.7%
|
08/15/11
|
GLRE
|
21.91
|
Long
|
500
|
$21.75
|
10,955
|
80
|
0.7%
|
08/15/11
|
RJF
|
26.2
|
Long
|
375
|
$25.50
|
9,825
|
263
|
2.7%
|
08/15/11
|
BRK
|
72.89
|
Long
|
150
|
$71.00
|
10,934
|
284
|
2.7%
|
08/09/11
|
WMT
|
56.89
|
Long
|
175
|
$49.14
|
9,956
|
1,357
|
15.8%
|
12/28/10
|
CSCO
|
17.5
|
Long
|
483
|
$20.21
|
8,458
|
(1,312)
|
-13.4%
|
09/01/11
|
FDO
|
55.8
|
Long
|
200
|
$51
|
11,160
|
960
|
9.4%
|
12/10/10
|
NEM
|
63.77
|
Long
|
175
|
$60.59
|
11,160
|
557
|
5.2%
|
02/11/10
|
MU July 9 strike Puts
|
3.5
|
Long
|
1,000
|
$0.40
|
3,500
|
3,100
|
775.0%
|
02/15/10
|
NLY
|
15.94
|
Long
|
590
|
$16.03
|
9,405
|
(53)
|
-0.6%
|
2/111/11
|
GLD
|
163.4
|
Long
|
75
|
$132.40
|
12,255
|
2,325
|
23.4%
|
TD AMERITRADE
|
15.19
|
Long
|
533
|
$18.40
|
8,101
|
(1,712)
|
-17.4%
|
|
AAPL
|
363.57
|
Long
|
30
|
$341.00
|
10,907
|
677
|
6.6%
|
|
02/04/11
|
TEVA
|
36.91
|
Long
|
200
|
$51.09
|
7,382
|
(2,835)
|
-27.7%
|
01/05/11
|
HPQ
|
26.38
|
Long
|
223
|
$43.46
|
5,892
|
(3,815)
|
-39.3%
|
12/27/10
|
SPY
|
116.2
|
Short Sell
|
(78)
|
$125.50
|
(9,102)
|
729
|
7.4%
|
201,507
|
7,027
|
|||||||
4,841
|
||||||||
Bonds
|
$
57,352
|
28.5%
|
$ (2,186)
|
|||||
Stocks
|
$
144,155
|
71.5%
|
$
5,439
|
|||||
Portfolio Size
|
$
201,507
|
|||||||
Return
|
2.4%
|
|||||||
SPY yr end 2010
|
$
125.75
|
|||||||
Market Return YTD
|
-7.6%
|
The stock prices are adjusted downward for dividends, in case you are wondering why some of these prices look a tad lower then where I recommended them. Overall, I cannot complain, despite the fact that this portfolio is only up 2.4%. The S&P is down 7.6% year to date. My biggest winner actually was puts on Micron Technology, MU, which I seemed to have timed perfectly. In theory, $400 in put options turned into $3100 in profits as the stock fell by half. I am thinking that I will use more options next year.
Real World Portfolio
Overall this portfolio is up 1.6%, but my real world portfolio is barely flat. Why? Well, I carefully follow a 10% stop loss on trades, keeping me out of continued losses in names like TEVA and HPQ as they plummetted, but causing me to miss the complete meltdown of NFLX. That tells me that my stop losses have hurt returns, albeit admittedly my portfolio showed less volatility than this one. More volatility, more return. The stock picking isn't bad, but I am going to revisit my stop loss rule, or perhaps trade more gradually into stocks.
Time Arbitrage
There is a phrase I heard recently that makes a ton of sense to me: Time Arbitrage. Humans beings by there very nature are extremely short term focused. We think 6 months is a long time, and nobody can even really conceive of 20 years. A "lifetime" to many people. Given the increasing number of dollars flowing into hedge funds, who have quarterly liquidity, the pressure to produce instant returns is high. One bad year can kill a fund, either from heavy investor redemptions or from the problem of not making money until high water marks are met.
Furthermore, if a common hedge fund rule is to stop loss a trade at down 10%, then is it a coincidence that the market seemingly is gyrating up and down by 10% at a time? Going forward, I think the best trades are going to be the ones that seemingly won't pan out for at least 6-12 months. Yes, perhaps there will be some sitting in a value trap name, but clearly its better to be early than late. Buying late usually means you have missed most of the run, and risk is much higher too.
Tomorrow I am going to buy back Teva around $38. Its a classic example of this. Generic drugs have tons of growth over the next 5 years. However, there aren't any major drugs going off patent until 2012, meaning that their numbers will look weak until perhaps even 2013. I'll collect the 2% dividend yield (better than treasuries still), and sell some $35 puts too. That means that if TEVA falls below $35, I will automatically buy more at that price, less the premium I received to sell the put (last quote was around $3.20 for June 2012 puts).
No comments:
Post a Comment